Pour l’analogie

• Autores: Esa Itkonen
• Localización: Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics, ISSN-e 1139-4218, Nº. Extra 18, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Analogie, figement et polysémie), págs. 5-11
• Idioma: francés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1 (pdf)   2  
• Resumen
  • English

    In two slightly different ways, iconicity and isomorphism exemplify the notion of structural similarity, which is also the traditional definition of analogy. A new generalisation has been made when a new structural similarity has been either discovered or invented. In today’s cognitive linguistics, analogy as the source of generalisations has been renamed either "schema" (Langacker) or "construction" (Goldberg).

  • français

    L’iconicité et l’isomorphisme exemplifient de deux manières légèrement différentes l’idée de similarité structurelle, ce qui est aussi la définition d’analogie. Une nouvelle généralisation consiste ou bien à reconnaître une similarité structurelle jusqu’alors inconnue ("découverte") ou bien à en créer une nouvelle ("inventée"). Dans la linguistique cognitive actuelle, l’analogie en tant que base des généralisations a été rebaptisée comme "schéma" (Langacker) ou "construction" (Goldberg).

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anttila, Raimo. 1989 [1972] Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bloomfield, Leonard 1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Bréal, Michel 1921 [1897] Essai de sémantique, 5ème edition. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
  • Goldberg, Adele E. 1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Householder, Fred 1969 Compte rendu de Langacker 1968. Language 43,4: 886- 897.
  • Itkonen, Esa 1991 Universal History of Linguistics: India, China, Arabia, Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Itkonen, Esa 2005a Ten Non-European Languages: An Aid to the Typologist. University of Turku: Publications in General Linguistics 9.
  • Itkonen, Esa 2005b Analogy as Structure and Process: Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology, and Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam:...
  • Itkonen, Esa 2013 Functional explanation and its uses. In: Bischoff, S.T. & Jany, C. (eds.): Functional Approaches to Language Berlin:...
  • Jespersen, Otto 1965 [1924] Philosophy of Grammar. Londres: Allen Unwin.
  • Keenan, Edward 1976 Towards a universal definition of subject. In: Li, Ch. (ed.): Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 303-334.
  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1974 Remarks on analogical change. In: Anderson, John M. & Jones, Ch. eds.: Historical Linguistics II. Amsterdam: North-Holland,...
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1968 Language and its Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: DeGruyter.
  • Levinson, Stephen C. & Niclas Burenhult. 2009. Semplates: A new concept in lexical semantics. Language 85/1, pp. 153-173.
  • Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tuggy, David. 2007. Schematicity. In: Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 82-116)....