Adaptation of Arabic gutturals in Turkish: an optimality theoretic perspective

• Mufleh Salem M. Alqahtani ^[1]
  1. [1] King Saud University

     King Saud University

     Arabia Saudí

     
• Localización: Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, ISSN 0718-5758, ISSN-e 0717-1285, Nº. 70, 2025, págs. 95-130
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.7764/onomazein.70.05
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • This paper examines the repair strategies for adapting Arabic gutturals in Turkish such as Debuccalization, Uvular Fronting, and Guttural Deletion from an Optimality Theoretic perspective. It concludes that the debuccalization of the Arabic /χ/ and /ħ/ to the Turkish /h/ results from the non-readability of the Retracted Tongue Root (henceforth [RTR]) (i.e. circled [RTR]) and the availability of the Pharyngeal node as well as the [-voice] Laryngeal feature in Turkish (i.e. based on the availability of the Turkish /h/). The Arabic /q/ is adapted as the Turkish velar's /k/ (i.e. Uvular Fronting) to concur with the No Place Node Branching Constraint through the avoidance of the binary place node in the feature representation of /q/. The adaptation of the Arabic /ʁ/ as the Turkish /ɣ/ is to avoid the voiced glottal fricative /ɦ/ as a non-existent consonant in Turkish. The deletion of Arabic /ʕ/ and /ʔ/ is attributed to the Non-Availability of the [+constricted glottis] feature in Turkish, while the Arabic /h/ is preserved in Turkish in the word-initial position only. Optimality Theory (henceforth OT) is successfully utilized to account for the above repair strategies.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abu-Manga, A., 1986: Fulfulde in the Sudan: Process of Adaptation to Arabic, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
  • Algarni, M., 2021: “The Adaptation of Arabic Laryngeals and Pharyngeals in Amharic and Argobba”, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics...
  • Al-Hashmi, S., 2016: The Phonetics and Phonology of Arabic Loanwords in Turkish: residual effects of gutturals. PhD dissertation, University...
  • Alqahtani, M., 2014: Syllable Structure and Related Processes in Optimality Theory: An Examination of Najdi Arabic. PhD dissertation, Newcastle...
  • Alqarni, M., 2021: “Arabic loanwords in seven Ethiopian languages: Theoretical challenges to the TCRS framework”, Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic...
  • Alshammari, W. F., and A. Alshammari, 2020: “Adaptation of Turkish Loanwords Originating from Arabic”, International Journal of English Linguistics...
  • Archangeli, D. B., and D. G. Pulleyblank, 1994: Grounded phonology. MIT Press.
  • Batais, S., 2013: Consonantal and syllabic repairs of Arabic and Dutch loanwords in Indone-sian: A phonological account. PhD dissertation,...
  • Batais , S., 2019: “Featural Faithfulness in Consonantal Repairs of Arabic Loanwords in Sun-danese”, Linguistics and Literature Studies 7...
  • Beckman, J., 1998: Positional Faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachu-setts Amherst.
  • Broselow, E., 2009: “Stress adaptation in loanword phonology: Perception and learnability” in P. Boersma, S. Hamann (eds.): Phonology in Perception,...
  • De Lacy, P., 2005: “Markedness exists”. Handout from invited talk on October 7, 2005, at the Linguistics department, Stony Brook University.
  • Delattre, P., 1971: “Pharyngeal features in the consonants of Arabic, German, Spanish, French, and American English”, Phonetica 23 (3), 129-155.
  • Diallo, A., 1992: “Le fula au Guinea: Étude phonologique et morphologique”, Revue de Linguistique et de Littérature.
  • Göksel, A., and C. Kerslake, 2005: Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hamann, S., 2002: “Retroflexion and retraction revised”, ZAS papers in linguistics 28, 13-25.
  • Kager, R., 1999: Optimality Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kager, R., 2010: Optimality Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, Y., 2003: “Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean”, Phonology 20 (2), 219-273.
  • Kenstowicz, M., 2003: “The Role of Perception in Loanword Phonology”, Studies in African Linguistics 32, 95-112.
  • Kim, J., 2021: “Perception of foreign segments in loanword phonology”, Lingua 262,1-13.
  • Kornfilt, J., 1997: Turkish, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Lewis, G., 2000: Turkish Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Maddieson, I., 1984: Patterns of Sounds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahyoob, M., 2021: “The Influence of Stress on Allophonic Alteration in Standard Arabic: An Optimality Theoretic Perspective”, The Asian EFL...
  • McCarthy, J. J., 1991: “Semitic gutturals and distinctive feature theory”, Perspectives on Arabic linguistics 3, 63-91.
  • McCarthy, J. J., 1994: “The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals”, Papers in laboratory phonology III: Phonological structure and...
  • McCarthy, J. J., 2008: Doing Optimality Theory, Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • McCarthy, J. J., and A. Prince, 1995: “Faithfulness and reduplicative identity” in J. Beckman, L. Dickey and S. Urbanczyk (eds.): Papers in...
  • McCarthy, K., 1970: The linguistic adaptation of loanwords in Modern Standard Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel...
  • Mielke, J., 2002: “Turkish/h/deletion: evidence for the interplay of speech perception and phonology”, North East Linguistics Society 32 (2),...
  • Msuya, J., and A. Y. Mreta , 2019: “Adaptation of loanwords in Chasu”, Journal of Linguistics and Language in Education 13, 26-46.
  • O'Brien, J., 2012: An experimental approach to debuccalization and supplementary gestures. PhD dissertation, University of California,...
  • Odden, D., 2005: Introducing phonology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oytunaltun, H., 2015: “Arapça alıntı kelimelerin Kazak Türkçesine uyarlanması”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları (HÜTAD) 22 (22),...
  • Paradis, C., and D. LaCharité, 1997: “Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation”, Journal of linguistics 33 (2), 379-430.
  • Paradis, C., and D. LaCharité, 2001: “Guttural deletion in loanwords”, Phonology 18 (2), 255-300.
  • Prince, A., and P. Smolensky, 1993: Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rose, S., 1996: “Variable laryngeals and vowel lowering”, Phonology 13 (1), 73-117.
  • Silverman, D., 1992: “Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese”, Phonology 9 (2), 289-328.
  • Stoltzfus, D., 2014: Predictions on markedness and feature resilience in loanword adaptation. PhD dissertation, Université Laval.
  • Van der Hulst, H., and J. Van de Weijer, 1991: “Topics in Turkish phonology”, Turkish linguis-tics today, Brill, 11-59.
  • Yavuz, H., A. Balci and Z. Balpinar, 2011: “Turkish phonology and morphology”, Anadolu University.
  • Yip , M., 2002: “Perceptual influences in Cantonese loanword phonology”, Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6 (1), 4-21.
  • Zimmer , K., 1985: “Arabic loanwords and Turkish phonological structure”, International journal of American linguistics 51 (4), 623-625.