Binding as an A�-phenomenon?: some remarks from Turkish

• Autores: Hasan Mesut Meral
• Localización: Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, ISSN-e 1989-8525, Vol. 5, Nº. 1, 2013, págs. 45-68
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alexopoulou, Theodora. 2006. Resumption in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24, 57-111.
  • Aoun, Joseph, Lina Choueiri. 2000. Epithets. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18, 1-39.
  • Arslan, Ceyda. 2006. Case as an Uninterpretable Feature. Ph.D. Dissertation. Boğaziçi University.
  • Aygen, Gülşat. 2002. Finiteness, case and clausal architecture. Ph. D. Dissertation. Harvard University.
  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government
  • and Binding. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Enç, Mürvet. 1986. Topic switching and pronominal subjects in Turkish. In Dan I
  • Slobin & Karl Zimmer (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics. Amsterdam: John
  • Benjamins, 195-208.
  • Enç, Mürvet. 1989. Pronouns, licensing, and binding. Natural Language & Linguistic
  • Theory 7(1), 51-92.
  • Erguvanlı-Taylan, Eser. 1986. Pronominal versus zero representation of anaphora in
  • Turkish. In Dan I Slobin & Karl Zimmer (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 209-231.
  • Fox, Dany & Jon Nissenbaum. 2004. Condition A and scope reconstruction. Linguistic
  • Inquiry 35(3), 474-485.
  • Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Oxford:
  • Oxford University Press.
  • Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific Domains: On the Anti-locality of Movement
  • Dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Hicks, Glyn. 2008. Why the Binding Theory doesn’t apply at LF? Syntax 11(3), 255-280.
  • Hornstein, Norbert. 2006. Pronouns in a Minimalist setting. Working Papers in
  • Linguistics 14, 47-80.
  • İnce, Atakan. 2006. Direct complement clauses as object control structures in Turkish.
  • In Erin Bainbridge & Brian Agbayani (eds.), Proceedings of WECOL 17.
  • California: California State University, 208-221.
  • Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel & Selçuk İşsever. 2012. Deriving A/A’-Effects in Topic
  • Fronting: Intervention of Focus and Binding. In Joana Blaszczak, Bozena Rozwadowska & Wojciech Witkowski (eds.), Current Issues in Generative...
  • Kayne, Richard. 2002. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Samuel D. Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the...
  • Kerslake, Celia. 1986. NP deletion and pronominalization in Turkish. In Hendrick Boeschoten (ed.), Studies on Modern Turkish. Verhoeven: Tilburg...
  • Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1984. Case Marking, Agreement and Empty Categories in Turkish. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.
  • Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2001. Local and Long-Distance Reflexives in Turkish. In Peter Cole,
  • Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (eds.), Long Distance Reflexives (Syntax
  • and Semantics 33). Bingley-West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing, 197-226.
  • Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2004. Agr in Turkish as an Expression of Categorial Features. In Meltem Kelepir & Balkız Öztürk (eds.), MIT Working...
  • Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2007. Verbal and nominalized finite clauses in Turkish. In Irina
  • Nikoloeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 305-332.
  • Kural, Murat. 1993. V-to-I-to-C in Turkish. In Filippo Beghelli & Murat Kural (eds.),UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11, 17-54.
  • Lasnik, Howard & Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687-720.
  • Meral, Hasan Mesut. 2005. On some ECM constructions in Turkish. Ms. Boğaziçi University.
  • Meral, Hasan Mesut. 2010. Resumption, A’-chains and implications on clausal architecture. Ph.D. Dissertation. Boğaziçi University.
  • Özsoy, A. Sumru. 1984. On the syntactic properties of empty categories. In Ayhan Koç & Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (eds.), Proceedings of...
  • Özsoy, A. Sumru. 1988. On complementation in Turkish: Possessed impersonal infinitives. In Sabri Koç (ed.), Studies on Turkish Linguistics....
  • Özsoy, A. Sumru. 2001. On ‘small’ clauses, other ‘bare’ verbal complements and feature checking in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (ed.),...
  • Öztürk, Balkız. 2001. Turkish as a Non-Pro-Drop Language. In Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (ed.), The Verb in Turkish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,...
  • Öztürk, Balkız. 2005. Case, Referentiality and Phrase structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 439-492.
  • Reuland, Eric. 2005. Binding conditions: how are they derived? In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference. Stanford: CSLI...
  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative syntax....
  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), WH-Movement...
  • Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2005. Strategies of Subject Extraction. Ms., University of Siena, University of Geneva.
  • Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
  • Rudnev, Pasha. 2008. Some Syntax and Semantics of Long-Distance Reflexives in Turkish and Elsewhere. Ms. Umass.
  • Safir, Ken. 2008. Coconstrual and narrow syntax. Syntax 11(3), 330-355.
  • Sezer, Engin. 1979. On reflexivization in Turkish. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 3(4), 748-759.
  • Sezer, Engin. 1991. Issues in Turkish Syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation. Harvard University.
  • Sharvit, Yael. 1999. Resumptive pronouns in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17, 587-612.
  • Sportiche, Dominique. 2006. Reconstruction, binding and scope. In Martin Everaert
  • & Henk von Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax IV. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 35-93.
  • Zidani-Eroğlu, Leyla. 1997. Exceptionally case-marked NPs as matrix objects. Linguistic
  • Inquiry 28(2), 219-230.