The Impact of Type of Approach (CLIL Versus EFL) and Methodology (Book-Based Versus Project Work) on Motivation

• Autores: David Lasagabaster Herrarte , Raquel López Beloqui
• Localización: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 23, 2015, págs. 41-57
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.30827/digibug.53737
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Dialnet Métricas: 23 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    En este estudio se examina el efecto del tipo de enfoque y de la metodología en diferentes tipos de motivación: intrínseca, extrínseca, motivación instrumental e integradora, al tiempo que también se presta atención al interés en otras culturas y al ambiente de aprendizaje. Los dos tipos de enfoque bajo estudio son AICLE (Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lengua Extranjera) y no-AICLE o enseñanza tradicional del inglés como asignatura de lengua, y los dos tipos de metodología se basan o bien en el libro de texto o bien en el trabajo por proyectos. Mientras estudios anteriores han analizado el efecto del TP y/o AICLE en educación secundaria (Seikkula-Leino, 2007, Lasagabaster, 2011; Sierra, 2011), la principal novedad del presente estudio radica en que se centra en estudiantes de educación primaria. El instrumento utilizado fue un cuestionario cumplimentado por tres grupos de participantes: un grupo no-AICLE que aprendía inglés como asignatura basándose en el libro de texto, un grupo AICLE que seguía una metodología centrada en el libro de texto, y un grupo AICLE que trabajaba por proyectos. Los resultados confirman que AICLE afecta positivamente distintos aspectos motivacionales incluso a edades tempranas, mientras que el efecto del TP no resultó tan beneficioso como se esperaba.

    Palabras clave: Motivación, AICLE, trabajo por proyectos, educación primaria.

  • English

    This study analyses the effect of type of approach and methodology on different types of motivation: intrinsic, extrinsic, instrumental and integrative motivation; interest in other cultures and learning environment are also considered. The two types of approaches under scrutiny are CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) and non-CLIL or EFL (English as a foreign language), and the two types of methodology are based on either the textbook or project work (PW). Previous studies have examined the effect of PW and/or CLIL on secondary education (Seikkula-Leino, 2007, Lasagabaster, 2011; Sierra, 2011), but the novelty of the present research lies in the fact that it is focused on primary education students. The data were collected through a questionnaire filled in by three groups of participants: a non-CLIL and book-based group taught conventionally, a CLIL and book-based methodology group, and a CLIL and PW group. The results bore out that CLIL is beneficial for some motivational clusters even at an early age, whereas the impact of PW was not as positive as expected.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Chambers, G. N. (1999). Motivating Language Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Coyle, D. (2007). “Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies”, in The International...
  • Coyle, D., Marsh, D. and Hood, P. (2011). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Csizér, K. and Dörnyei, Z. (2005). “The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning...
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). “Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31:...
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. and Smit, U. (eds.), (2007). Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (1990). “Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning”, in Language Learning, 40: 46– 78.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2000). “Motivation in action: Toward a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation”, in British Journal of Educational...
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • European Commission (1995). White Paper: Teaching and Learning Towards the Learning Society, Objective IV. Brussels: Council of Europe, DGV.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Gardner, R. C. (2001). “Integrative motivation and second language acquisition”, in Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second...
  • Gardner, R. C., and Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Goodrich, H., Hatch, T., Wiatrowski, G., and Unger, C. (1995). Teaching through projects: Creating effective learning environments. CA: Innovative...
  • Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1997). “Internalization within the family: The selfdetermination perspective”, in J. E. Grusec...
  • Hunt, M. J. (2011). “Learners’ perceptions of their experiences of learning subject content through a foreign language”, Educational Review,...
  • Koh, C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Liu, W. C., and Ee, J. (2009). “Students’ discourse and motivation in project work”, in P. L. Jeffery...
  • Kurzel, F and Rath, M. (2007). “Project Based Learning and Learning Environment”, in Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information...
  • Lamb, M. (2004) “Integrative motivation in a globalizing world”, in System, 32: 3-19.
  • Lasagabaster, D. (2011). “English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings”, in Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching,...
  • Liu, w. C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Koh, C. and Ee, J. (2009). “A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in...
  • Lorenzo, F., Casal, S, Moore, P., Afonso, T. (2009). Bilingüismo y educación. Situación de la Red de Centros bilingües en Andalucía. Sevilla:...
  • Marsh, D. (ed.) (2002). CLIL/EMILE—The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential, Public Services Contract DG EAC, European...
  • Muñoz, C. and Navés, T. (2007). “Windows on CLIL in Spain”, in A. Maljers, D. Marsh, and D. Wolff (eds.), Windows on CLIL European Centre...
  • Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., García, T. y Mckeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivational strategies for learning questionnaire...
  • Ribé, R. (2000). “Introducing Negotiation Processes: an Experiment with Creative Project Work”, in Breen, M. P. and Littlejohn, A. (Eds)....
  • Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2000). “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions”, in Contemporary Educational Psychology,...
  • Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. “CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors”, in Language and Education 21: 328-341.
  • Sierra, J.M. (2011). “CLIL and Project Work: Contributions from the Classroom”, in Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J.M., and Gallardo del Puerto,...
  • Stoller, F. (2002). “Project Work: A Means to Promote Language and Content”, in Jack, C. Richards & Willy, A. Renandya (eds.), Methodology...
  • Thomas, J.W., (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.