Tecnologías reproductivas, Ley de Familia y el Estado de post-bienestar: las “victorias” de los derechos de padres del mismo sexo en California en 2005

• Autores: Anna Marie Smith
• Localización: DeSignis: Publicación de la Federación Latinoamericana de Semiótica ( FELS ), ISSN 1578-4223, Nº. 19, 2012 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Estudios queer semiótica y políticas de la sexualidad), págs. 58-66
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Edin, K. y Lein, L. ( 1997) Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Elisa B. v. Superior Court (37 Cal. 4th 108 (2005).
  • Family Code. State of California (2008).
  • Fineman, M. A. (1995) The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.
  • Hays, S. (2003) Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • K.M. v. E.G. (37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005).
  • Kristine H. v. Lisa R. (37 Cal. 4th 156 (2005).
  • Mink, G. (1998) Welfare’s End. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • National Center For Lesbian Rights (2005) “NCLR Applauds California Supreme Court Decisions in Groundbreaking Parenting Cases,” August 22.
  • Orloff, A. S. (1993) “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States” en American...
  • Piven, F. F. y Cloward, R. A. (1993) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.
  • Smith, A. M. (2007) Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waller, M. (2002) My Baby’s Father: Unmarried Parents and Paternal Responsibility. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (2003) “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State” en Signs. 29 (1):1-25.