The Language of Police Reports: A Quest for Precision or a Bureaucratic Exercise of Language Degradation

• Ćetković, Sanja ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Montenegro

     University of Montenegro

     Montenegro

     
• Localización: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, ISSN-e 1576-4737, Nº. 71, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Macrosintaxis y lingüística pragmática), págs. 159-176
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.5209/CLAC.57308
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The language of the members of law enforcement has been widely studied mostly in terms of investigating various aspects of police interview discourse. However, our aim here is to examine the language of police reports as a sample of written language of the police outside the context of police-suspect encounters and to describe some of its distinctive linguistic features which function as more or less effective means for achieving maximum clarity and precision. An intimate relationship between the language of legal documents and the language of police reports has been established with respect to style and specific language choices that characterize both registers. Nevertheless, we have observed some peculiar features of police written language that seem to be originating from a compelling need to be as accurate and all-inclusive as possible and to fully conform to conventional standards of report writing.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Berg, B., Gibbs G., Miller M. (2012). Report Writing for Police and Correctional Officers. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
  • Berk-Seligson, S. (2009). Coerced Confessions, The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Biber, D., Leech G., Conrad S. (2002). Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Büring, D. (2005). Binding Theory. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Butt P., Castle R. (2006). Modern Legal Drafting: A Guide to Using Clearer Language. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cotterill, Janet. 2004. Language in the Legal Process, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Coulthard, M. (2006). ⋯and then⋯ Language Description and Author Attribution. (Available at http://www.aston.ac.uk/downloads/lss/english/Andthen-Coulthard.pdf)...
  • Coulthard, M., Johnson A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. New York, USA: Routledge, Taylor & Frances...
  • Crystal, David, Davy Derek. 1969. Investigating English Style, London, UK: Longman Group Limited.
  • Fox, G. (1993). A Comparison of "Policespeak" and "Normalspeak": A preliminary study. In Techniques of Description: Spoken...
  • Gibbons J. (2003) Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Judicial System, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Hall, P. (2008). Policespeak. In J. Gibbons and M. T. Turell, eds. Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins,...
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1988). On the Language of Physical Science. Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.) Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and...
  • Haworth, K. (2010). Police interviews in the judicial process: Police interviews as evidence. In M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, eds. Handbook...
  • Heffer, C., F. Rock, and J. Conley (ed.).(2013) Legal-Lay Communication: Textual Travels in the Law, Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics, Oxford...
  • Heydon, G. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hiltunen, R. (1990). Chapters on Legal English: Aspects past and present of the language of the law. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
  • Huddleston, R., Pullum G.K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hunt, B. (2002). Plain Language in Legislative Drafting: An Achievable Objective or a Laudable Ideal? Statute Law Review. 24: 112-124.
  • Jetmore, L. (2008). Investigations: Investigative Report Writing. Law Officer, January 31 (http://www.lawofficer.com/article/magazine-feature/investigative-report-writing).
  • Jönsson, L., Linell, P. (1991). Story generations: from dialogical interviews to written reports in police interrogations. Text 11/3: 419-440.
  • Katalin, E.K. (1991). The primacy condition of anaphora and pronominal variable binding. In Long-distance anaphora. eds. Jan Koster and Eric...
  • Leech G., Svatrvik J. (2003). A Communicative Grammar of English. London, UK: Routledge. Taylor and Frances Group.
  • Oates, L. & Enquist, A. (2009). Just writing: Grammar, punctuation, and style for the legal writer (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.
  • Pollard, C., Sag I. (1992). Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry (23): 261-303.
  • Quirk, R. (1960). Towards a description of English usage. Transactions of the Philological Society: 40-61.
  • Redwine, K.B. (2003). The Importance of the Police Report, Criminal Justice Institute School of Law Enforcement Supervision, Session XXII....
  • Reinhart T., Reuland E. (1991). Anaphors and logophors: an argument structure perspective. In Long-distance anaphora. eds. Jan Koster and...
  • Rock, Frances. 2007. Communicating Rights: The Language of Arrest and Detention: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Scaramella, G. L. (2012). Report Writing. In: Michael Birzer, Cliff Roberso, eds. Introduction to Criminal Investigation. New York, USA: CRC...
  • Scarry, L. (2008). Report Writing: What You Fail to Report Could Have Negative Consequences in Civil Litigation. Law Officer, January 30 (http://www.lawofficer.com/article/magazine-feature/report-writing).
  • Shuy, R. (1998). Bureaucratic Language in Government and Business. Washington DC, USA: Georgetown University Press.
  • Shuy, Roger W. 1998. The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shuy, Roger W. 2005. Creating Language Crimes, How Law Enforcement Uses (and Misuses) Language: Oxford University Press.
  • Stein, Dieter, 2015."Words, words, words" - But What's in a Legal Text, in Solan, L., J. Ainsworth, R. W. Shuy.(eds.). Speaking...
  • Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal Language. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tiersma, P. (2006). Some Myths about Legal Language, Journal of Law, Culture and Humanities 2: 9, 44-50.
  • Ure, J. (1982). Introduction: approaches to the study of register range. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 35, 5-23.
  • Wydick, R. C. (1978). Plain English for Lawyers. California Law Review. Volume 66 | Issue 4.