La vigilancia en la obra de Philip K. Dick: Identidades, deseos y conflictos sociales

• Autores: Nelson Arteaga Botello
• Localización: Valenciana, estudios de filosofía y letras, ISSN 2007-2538, Nº. 21, 2018, págs. 153-186
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.15174/rv.v0i21.322
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Surveillance in the work of Philip K. Dick:: Identities, desires and social conflicts
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Se analiza cómo la vigilancia en la obra de Philip K. Dick permite que actores e instituciones: a) construyan identidades, b) gestionen deseos y c) establezcan campos de disputas y conflictos de poder. La vigilancia aparece a veces como un mecanismo que sirve para la dominación y el control social, y en otras ocasiones como un dispositivo de resistencia que crea espacios de resistencia y autonomía social. Por tanto, la vigilancia puede ser usada con fines civiles y anti-civiles.Los rostros de la vigilancia en Dick permiten entender como ésta se desarrolla en sociedades democráticas y diferenciadas, al contrario de la metáfora del “Gran Hermano” orwelliano desarrollada en un contexto donde predomina una ideología y un régimen político totalitario.

  • English

    The article examines how surveillance, in Philip K. Dick’s work, allows actors and institutions: a) to construct identities, b) to manage desires, and c) to establish areas of disputes and conflicts of power. Surveillance sometimes appears as a mechanism that serves as domination and social control, and at other times as a device of resistance that creates spaces of resistance and social autonomy. Therefore, surveillance can be used for civil and anti-civil purposes. The faces of vigilance in Dick’s work allow us to understand how it develops in democratic and differentiated societies, unlike the metaphor of the Orwellian “Big Brother” developed in a context where an ideology and a totalitarian political regime prevail.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Albrechtslund, Anders y Dubbeld, Lynsey (2005), “The Plays and Arts of Surveillance: Studying, Surveillance as Entertainment”, Surveillance...
  • Alexander, Jeffrey, 2006, The Civil Sphere, University Press, Oxford, pp. 793.
  • Andrejevic, Mark, 2005, iSpy. Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. 325.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt y Lyon David, 2013, Liquid Surveillance, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 193.
  • Best Stevens y Kellner, Douglas, 2003, “The Apocalyptic Vision of Philip K. Dick”, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, Illinios, Vol....
  • Bogard, William, 2006, “Welcome to the society of control”, en Surveillance and visibility, Toronto University Press, pp. 4-25,
  • Booker, Keith, 1994, Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide, Greenwood Press, Westport, pp. 408.
  • Bould, Mark, 2015, “The futures market: American Utopias”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press,...
  • Bradbury, Ray, 2005, Fahrenheit 451, Minotauro, México, pp. 251.
  • Brooks, Peter, 2005, Realist Vision, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp.242
  • Cohen, Stanley, 1985, Visions of Social Control, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 336.
  • Deibert, Roland, 2003, “Black Code: Censorship, Surveillance, and the Militarisation of Cyberspace”, Journal of International Studies, Szczecin,...
  • Dick, Philip K. [1981], 2013, La invasión divina, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 254.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1977], 2006, Una mirada a la oscuridad, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 271.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1974], 2011, Fluyan mis lágrimas, dijo el policía, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp.265.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1970], 2007, Nuestros amigos de Frolik 8, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 238.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1969], 2013, Ubik, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 222.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1964], 2007, Simulacra, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 221.
  • Dick, Philip K. [1955], 2007, Lotería solar, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 213.
  • Dick, Philip K., 2005, The Collected Stories of Philip K. Dick, Citadel Press, New York, pp. 434.
  • Freedman, Carl, 2000, Critical Theory and Science Fiction, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, pp.228.
  • Gates, Kelly, 2009, New Media Addiction, Television & New Media, Tulane, Vol. 10 (1): 58-60
  • Gilliom Johm y Monahan, Torin, 2012, Supervision: An introduction to the surveillance society, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp....
  • Habermas, Jürgen, 1989, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MIT...
  • Haggerty Kevin y Ericcson, Richard (2000), The surveillant assemblage, British Journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605-622
  • Hayles, Kahterin, 1997, “RFID: Human Agency and Meaning in Information-Intensive Environments”, Theory, Culture & Society, London, Vol....
  • Higgins, David, 2015, “American Science Fiction after 9/11”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University...
  • Huxley, Aldous, 2010, A brave new world, Harper Perennial, New York, pp. 268.
  • Jameson, Fredric, 2007, Archaeologies of the future. The desire called Utopia and other Science Fictions, Verso, New York, pp. 431.
  • Jameson, Fredric, 1989, Documentos de cultura. Documentos de barbarie. La narrativa como acto socialmente simbólico, Visor, Madrid, pp. 243.
  • Jameson, Fredric, 1988, The Ideologies of Theory. Essays 1971-1986. Volume 2: The Syntax of History, Routledge, London, pp. 208.
  • Kammerer, Dietmar, 2012, “Surveillance in Literature, Film and Television”, en Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, Routledge, New...
  • Koskela, Hille, 2006, “The other side of surveillance: Webcams, power and agency”, en Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond,...
  • Lee, Gwen y Sauter, Doris, 2000, What if our world is their heaven? The final conversations of Philip K. Dick, Overlook, New York, pp. 204.
  • Lem, Stanislaw 1975, “Science Fiction: A hopeless case-with exceptions”, en Philip K. Dick: Electric shepherd, Norstrilia Press, Melburne,...
  • Levin, Ira, 2010, This Perfect Day, New York, Pegasus Books, pp. 320.
  • Link, Carl, 2010, Understanding Philip K. Dick, University of South Carolina, South Carolina, pp. 179.
  • Link, Carl y Canavan, Gerry, 2015, The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 254.
  • Lyon, David, 1994, The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 270.
  • Mackey, Douglas, 1988, Philip K Dick, T Wayne, Boston, pp. 157.
  • Mäkinen, Liisa, 2016, “Surveillance On/Off: Examining Home Surveillance Systems From The User’s Perspective”, Surveillance & Society,...
  • Martin, Aaron, Brakel, Rosamunde y Bernhard, Daniel, 2009, “Understanding resistance to digital surveillance Towards a multi-disciplinary,...
  • Marks, Peter, 2005, “Imagining Surveillance: Utopian Visions and Surveillance Studies”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 3(2/3), 222-239,
  • Marx, Gary, 2009, “Soul Train: The New Surveillance in Popular Music”, en Lessons from the Identity Trial: Anonymity, Privacy and identity...
  • Muri, Allison, 2003, “Of Shit and the Soul: Tropes of Cybernetic Disembodiment in Contemporary Culture”, Body & Society, London, Vol....
  • Nellis, Mike, 2009, “Since ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’: Representation of Surveillance in Literary Fiction”, en New Directions in Surveillance...
  • Nolan, William F. y Clayton, Johnson, 1969, Logan’s Run, Dell Books, New York, pp. 158.
  • Nussbaum, Martha, 1990, Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 423.
  • Palmer, Christopher, 2005, “Philip K. Dick”, en A companion to Science Fiction, Blackwell, Malden, pp. 389-397.
  • Philmus, Robert, 1991, “The two faces of Philip K. Dick”, Science Fiction Studies, Greencastle, Vol. 18: 93-103.
  • Pia Lara, Maria, 1998, “Narrative Cultural Interweavings: Between Fact and Fiction”, en Moral Textures: Feminist Narratives in the Public...
  • Leslie Poles Hartley, 1987, Facial Justice, Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford, pp. 225.
  • Rand, Ayn, 1999, Anthem, Plume, New York, pp. 253.
  • Reed, Isaac, 2011, Interpretation and Social Knowledge. On the use of Theory in the Human Sciences, The University of Chicago Press Chicago,...
  • Rorty, Richard, 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 228.
  • Seed, David, 2011, Science Fiction, A very Short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 147.
  • Shapiro, Michael, 2009, “Managing Urban Security: City Walls and Urban Metis”, Security Dialogue, Ottawa,Vol. 40(4–5): 443–461.
  • Sheldon, Rebekah, 2015, “After America”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp....
  • Srinivas, Nidhi, 1999, Managers as androids: Reading moral agency in Philip K. Dick, Organization, Vol. 6(4): 609-624.
  • Sutin, Lawrence, 1989, Divine Invasions: A life of Philip K. Dick, Carroll & Graf, New York, pp. 368.
  • Vaz, Paulo y Bruno, Fernanda, 2003, “Types of Self-Surveillance: from abnormality to individuals ‘at risk’ ”, Surveillance & Society,...
  • Wald, Priscilla, 2015, “Science, technology, and the environment”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University...
  • Whitebrook, Maureen, 1996, “Taking the narrative turn: what the novel has to offer political theory”, en Literature and the Political Imagination....
  • Williams Raymond, 2001, Cultura y sociedad, Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires, pp. 288.
  • Williams, Paul, 1986, Only apparently real, Arbor House, New York, pp. 184.
  • Yar, Majid, 2003, “Panoptic Power and the Pathologisation of Vision: Critical Reflections on the Foucauldian Thesis”, Surveillance & Society,...
  • Zamyantin, Yevgeny, 1993, We, Penguin Books, London, pp. 242.
  • Zedner, Lucia, 2007, “Pre-crime and post-criminology?”, Theoretical Criminology, Oxford Vol. 11(2): 261–281; 1362–4806.