Morphological self-repair: Self-repair within the word

• Barbara A. Fox ^[7] ; Fay Wouk ^[1] ; Steven Fincke ^[2] ; Wilfredo Hernandez Flores ^[2] ; Makoto Hayashi ^[3] ; Minna Laakso ^[4] ; Yael Maschler ^[5] ; Abolghasem Mehrabi ^[4] ; Marja-Leena Sorjone ^[4] ; Susanne Uhmann ^[6] ; Hyun Jung Yang ^[8]
  1. [1] University of Auckland

     University of Auckland

     Nueva Zelanda

     
  2. [2] Polish Air Force Academy

     Polish Air Force Academy

     Dęblin, Polonia

     
  3. [3] Nagoya University

     Nagoya University

     Naka-ku, Japón

     
  4. [4] University of Helsinki

     University of Helsinki

     Helsinki, Finlandia

     
  5. [5] University of Haifa

     University of Haifa

     Israel

     
  6. [6] University of Wuppertal

     University of Wuppertal

     Kreisfreie Stadt Wuppertal, Alemania

     
  7. [7] University of Colorado
  8. [8] University of West Virginia

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Studies in language: International Journal Sponsored by The Foundation "Foundations of Language", ISSN 0378-4177, Vol. 41, Nº 3, 2017, págs. 638-659
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1075/sl.41.3.04fox
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • In this study we explore patterns of same-turn self-repair within the word, across ten typologically and areally diverse languages. We find universal processes emerging through language-specific resources, namely: recycling is used to delay a next item due, while replacement is used to replace an inappropriate item. For example, most of our languages with prefixes or proclitics recycle those elements to delay production of the root/host, while languages with suffixes tend not to recycle just suffixes without their roots/hosts, since that would not serve to delay the production of the root/host; rather, the whole word is recycled. Replacement of affixes and clitics is rare, regardless of position. We provide several possible explanations for these facts, all based on the nature of replacement.