Epistemic modals in early Modern English history texts. Analysis of gender variation

• Autores: Francisco J. Álvarez Gil
• Localización: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas, ISSN 1886-2438, Nº. 13, 2018, págs. 13-20
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.4995/rlyla.2018.7801
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen

  • In the present study, samples of late Modern English scientific texts have been analysed to evaluate cases of epistemic modality as realised by modal verbs. The aim of this research was to detect if there exist variances in the way modals are used in historical texts from a gender perspective. For this, I have interrogated the Corpus History English Texts (1700-1900) which is part of The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Texts, which contains history texts written by male and female authors. I have used the Coruña Corpus Tool for retrieval, although manual analyses have been carried out as well. Each of the occurrences found have been categorised according to their contextual meanings. The results obtained account for a high frequency on the usage of these modal verbs according to gender and the diverse pragmatic functions these modal verbs accomplish in the communicative process, such as mitigation and negative politeness. From a pragmatic perspective, epistemic modals have the potential to allow negotiation of meaning between writers and their audience among other functions.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alonso-Almeida, F. and L. Cruz-García. (2011). “The value of may as an evidential and epistemic marker in English medical abstracts”. Studia...
  • Alonso-Almeida, F. (2015). “On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality from English and Spanish medical research papers”. Intercultural...
  • Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19: 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson...
  • Boye, K. and Harder, P. (2009). “Evidentiality: linguistic categories and grammaticalization”. Functions of Language, 16: 9-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
  • Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bybee, J., Revere P. and William P. (1994). The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago/London:...
  • Carretero, M. (2004). “The role of evidentiality and epistemic modality in three English spoken texts from legal proceedings”. Perspectives...
  • Chafe, W. (1986). “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing”. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Eds....
  • Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London/Canberra: Croom Helm.
  • Cornillie, B. (2009). “Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories”. Functions of Language,...
  • Crespo, B. and Moskowich, I. (2015). “A Corpus of History Texts (CHET) as part of the Coruña Corpus Project” in Proceedings of the international...
  • Dendale, P. and Tasmowski, L. (2001). “Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions”. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00005-9
  • Diewald, G., Kresic, M. and Smirnova, E. (2009). “The grammaticalization channels of evidentials and modal particles in German: Integration...
  • Dixon, R. W. (2005). A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, S. (2007). “Using a corpus to investigate stance quantitatively and qualitatively”. Stancetaking in Discourse. Ed. Robert Englebretson....
  • Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54
  • Hyland, K. (2001). “Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic article”. Written Communication, 18/4: 549-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005
  • Leech, G. (1974). Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Lightfoot, D. 1979. "Rule Classes and Syntactic Change". Linguistic Inquiry, 10: 83-108. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139165693
  • Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization. A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins....
  • Palmer, F. R. (2001). Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
  • Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
  • Perkins, M. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
  • Plank, F. (1983). Coming into Being among the Anglo-Saxons. In Davenport, Michael; Hansen, Erik and Nielsen, Hans Frede (eds). Current Topics...
  • Roberts, I. (1985). "Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries". Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,...
  • Salager-Meyer, F. 1992. “A text–type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts”, English...
  • Salkie, R. (1996). “Modality in English and French: A corpus–based approach”, Language Sciences, 18/1-2: 381– 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00026-5
  • Stukker, N., Sanders,T. and Verhagen, A. (2009). “Categories of Subjectivity in Dutch Causal Connectives: A Usage-Based Analysis”. Causal...
  • Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphoric and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Taavitsainen, I. and Päivi P. (1997). Corpus of early English medical writing 1375-1550. ICAME Journal, 21: 71-78.
  • Traugott, E. C. (1989). “On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change”. Language, 57: 33-65....
  • Van der Auwera, J. and Plungian, V.A. (1998). “Modality’s semantic map”. Linguistic Typology, 2: 79-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
  • Vold, E. (2006). “Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary”. International Journal of Applied...
  • Willett, T. (1988). “A Cross-linguistic Survey of Grammaticalization of Evidentiality”, Studies in Language, 12: 51-97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil