Similitud y contraste en el procesamiento léxico: aproximación teórico-práctica

• Carmen Varo Varo ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Cádiz

     Universidad de Cádiz

     Cádiz, España

     
• Localización: Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología, ISSN-e 2448-8224, ISSN 2448-6418, Vol. 5, Nº. 2, 2017, págs. 183-212
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Similarity and contrast in lexical processing: a theoretical and practical approach
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    En el presente trabajo1 nuestro objetivo es valorar la función que los rasgos de similitud y contraste desempeñan en los modelos cognitivos actuales del procesamiento lingüístico. De acuerdo con tal propósito, nos detenemos en las implicaciones de estos en la representación del conocimiento léxico y su relevancia para la caracterización de las relaciones semánticas. Por otra parte, presentamos varias evidencias científicas y algunos datos experimentales a favor de la eficiencia del principio de contraste que nos permiten cuestionar las propuestas mayoritarias elaboradas hasta el momento.

  • English

    The aim of this work is to assess the function of similarity and contrast semantic features in the current cognitive models of language processing. According to this purpose, we review their role in lexical knowledge representation and their relevance for characterizing seman-tic relations. Furthermore, we present some theoretical evidence and experimental data to support the efficiency of contrast principle, which allows us to discuss the dominant models developed so far.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aprile, L. (1992), “Modello di sviluppo dei fattori cognitivo-linguistici della tautologia, sinonimia e antonimia nei bambini dai 3 ai 6 anni...
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1987), “The inestability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts”, en U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and...
  • Berthonneau, A.-M. (1993), “Avant/apres. De l’espace au temps”, Lexique, 11, pp. 41-109.
  • Blair, M. y D. Homa (2005), “Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions: when more is less”, Journal of Experimental Psychology:...
  • Blair, M. y S. C. Somerville (2009), “The importance of differentiation in young children’s acquisition of expertise”, Cognition, 112, pp....
  • Bolinger, D. L. (1977), Meaning and form, Londres, Longman.
  • Bréal, M. (1883), “Les lois intellectuelles du langage. Fragment de sémantique”, Annuaire de l’Association pour l’encouragement des études...
  • Breál, M. (1897), Essai de sémantique. Science des significations (1924, 7ª ed.), París, Librairie Hachette.
  • Butters, N., M. Barton y B. A. Brody (1970), “Role of the right parietal lobe in the mediation of cross modal associations and reversible...
  • Caramazza, A. et al. (1976), “Right hemisphere damage and verbal problem solving”, Brain and Language, 3, pp. 41-46.
  • Casas Gómez, M. (2014), “A typology of relations in semantics”, Quaderni di Semantica, 35, 2, pp. 45-73.
  • Chaffin, R. y D. J. Herrmann (1984), “The similarity and diversity of semantic relations”, Memory and Cognition, 12, pp. 134-141.
  • Charles, W. G. et al. (1994), “Conceptual and associative processing in antonymy and synonymy”, Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 3, pp. 329-354.
  • Clark, E. V. (1972), “On the child’s acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fields”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11,...
  • Clark, E. V. (1987), “The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition”, en B. MacWhitney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition,...
  • Clark, E. V. (1995), The lexicon in acquisition, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  • Croft, W. y D. A. Cruse (2004), Cognitive linguistics, Cambridge, UK, Cambrigde University Press.
  • Di Giacomo, D. et al. (2012), “Semantic associative relations and conceptual processing”, Cognitive Processing, 13, pp. 55-62.
  • Doumas, L. A. et al. (2008), “A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts”, Psychological Review, 115, pp. 1-43.
  • Feider, H. (1973), “Comparatives in early child language”, Glossa, 7, 1, pp. 3-20.
  • Fellbaum, C. (1995), “Co-ocurrence and antonymy”, International Journal of Lexicography, 8, 4, pp. 281-303.
  • Gardner, H. et al. (1978), “The appreciation of antonymic contrasts in aphasia”, Brain and Language, 6, 3, pp. 301-317.
  • Gazzaniga, M. S. y G. Miller (1989), “The recognition of antonymy by a language-enriched right hemisphere”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,...
  • Geckeler, H. (1976), Semántica estructural y teoría del campo léxico, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975), “Logic and conversation”, en P. Cole y J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3: Speech acts, Nueva York, Academic...
  • Gross, D. et al. (1989), “The organization of adjectival meanings”, Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1, pp. 92-106.
  • Hammer, R. et al. (2009), “The development of category learning strategies: what makes the difference?”, Cognition, 112, 1, pp. 105-119.
  • Herrmann, D. J. et al. (1986), “The role of elements of relation definition in antonym and synonym comprehension”, Zeitschrift für Psychologie...
  • Hjelmslev, L. (1971), Prolegómenos a una teoría del lenguaje, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Jackendoff, R. (1983), Semantics and cognition, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
  • Jakobson, R. (1975), Ensayos de lingüística general, Barcelona, Seix Barral.
  • Jones, S. (2002), Antonymy. A corpus-based perspective, Londres, Routledge.
  • Justeson, J. S. y S. M. Katz (1991), “Redefining antonymy: the textual structure of a semantic relation”, Literary and Linguistic Computing,...
  • Karčeuskij, S. (1929), “Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique”, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 1, pp. 88-93.
  • Keil, F. C. (2008), “The primal frontier? Spatial cognition and the origin of concepts”, Philosophical Psychology, 21, 2, pp. 241-250.
  • Krampen, M. (1984), “Binary features and visual semantics. A study of children’s drawings of different buildings types”, Quaderni di Semantica,...
  • Lamb, S. (1999), Pathways of the brain. The neurocognitive basis of language, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins.
  • Livingston, K. R. y J. K. Andrews (2005), “Evidence for an ageindependent process in category learning”, Developmental Science, 8, pp. 319-325.
  • Mahon, B. y A. Caramazza (2009), “Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp....
  • Malt, B. C. (1995), “Category coherence in cross-cultural perspective”, Cognitive Psychology, 29, pp. 207-230.
  • Mandler, J. M. (2008), “On the birth and growth of concepts”, Philosophical Psychology, 21, 2, pp. 207-230.
  • Markman, A. B. y D. Gentner (1993), “Structural alignment during similarity comparisons”, Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp. 431-467.
  • Medin, D. L. et al. (1990), “Similarity involving attributes and relations: judgments of similarity and difference are not inverses”, Psychological...
  • Mettinger, A. (1994), Aspects of semantic opposition in English, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, G. et al. (1990), “Introduction to WordNet: an on-line database”, International Journal of Lexicography, 3, pp. 235-244.
  • Miller, G. y C. Fellbaum (1991), “Semantic networks of English”, Cognition, 41, pp. 197-229.
  • Muehleisen, V. (1997), Antonymy and semantic range in English, Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2004), The big book of concepts, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
  • Murphy, G. L. y J. M. Andrew (1993), “The conceptual basis of antonymy and synonymy in adjectives”, Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 3,...
  • Murphy, L. M. (2003), Semantic relations and the lexicon, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2005), The neuroscience of language (reimpr), Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  • Quinn, P. C. (2004), “Development of subordinate-level categorization in 3-to 7 month-old infants”, Child Development, 75, pp. 886-899.
  • Randall, B. et al. (2004), “Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structures: Behavioral and computational studies”, Journal of Experimental...
  • Rosch, E. et al. (1976), “Basic objects in natural categories”, Cognitive Psychology, 8, pp. 382-439.
  • Sabourin, L. y G. Libben (2000), “Lexical processing of synonymy and antonymy: an exploration of task and word form differences”, University...
  • Saussure, F. de (1980), Curso de lingüística general (publicado por Ch. Bally y A. Sechehaye, trad. esp.), Barcelona, Akal.
  • Singleton, D. (2000), Language and the lexicon: an introduction, Nueva York, Oxford, University Press.
  • Talmy, L. (2000), Toward a cognitive semantics, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
  • Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1973), Principios de fonología, Madrid, Paraninfo.
  • Tversky, A. (1977), “Features of similarity”, Psychological Review, 84, 4, pp. 327-352.
  • Ullmann, M. T. (2006), “Language and the brain”, en J. Connor-Linton y R. W. Fasold (eds.), An introduction to language and linguistics, Cambridge,...
  • Varo Varo, C. (2003), La polaridad en el lenguaje, Cádiz, Universidad de Cádiz (Documentos de Investigación Lingüística, 8).
  • Varo Varo, C. (2010), “El procesamiento de las relaciones léxicas”, Revista Española de Lingüística, 40, 1, pp. 149-171.
  • Vaughan, J. et al. (1982), “Cortical evoked responses to synonyms and antonyms”, Memory and Cognition, 10, 3, pp. 225-231.
  • Wotjak, G. (1979), Investigaciones sobre la estructura del significado, Madrid, Gredos.