A Corpus-based Study of I am thinking in Political Speeches

• Autores: Montserrat Martínez Vázquez
• Localización: LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, ISSN 1133-1127, Vol. 24, Nº 2, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos. Issue dedicated to Professor Françoise Salager-Meyer), págs. 107-123
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • This paper examines the occurrence of I am thinkingin political speeches as opposed to general discourse. This combination containing a verb traditionally considered incompatible with the progressive seems to be evolving and extending its range of functions. Data drawn from a reference corpus of British English shows that I am thinkingserves a wide array of discursive functions, besides its basic propositional cogitate meaning (parenthetical, filler, narrative and interpretative). In political speeches the construction has developed an almost exclusive cohesive role, i.e. the speaker’s clarification of a previous utterance. This use, which derives from the interpretative progressive, is not available with the simple form, I think, a phrase extensively studied in the past decades as an epistemic unit with dissimilar functions in different types of discourse (Simon-Vandenbergen 2000). This analysis, furthermore, makes an important contribution to the understanding of the progressive as a marker of contingency (Goldsmith & Woisetschlaeger 1982; De Wit & Brisard 2014), highly interpretable in a situational or linguistic context.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aarts, B., Close, J. & Wallis, S. (2010). Recent changes in the use of the progressive construction in English. In B. Cappelle & N....
  • Aijmer, K., (1997). I think –an English modal particle. In T. Swan & O. JansenWestvik (Eds.), Modality in the Germanic Languages (pp....
  • Alexander, M. & Davies, M. (2015-) Hansard Corpus 1803-2005. Available online at http://www.hansard-corpus.org.
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
  • Brinton, L. J. (2008). The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bybee, J. (2015). Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Calver, E. (1946). The uses of the present tense forms in English. Language 22(4). 317-325.
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Wit, A. & Brisard, F. (2014). A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive. Journal of Linguistics...
  • Downing, A. (2015). English grammar: A university course. London: Rutledge.
  • Goldsmith, J. & Woisetschlaeger, E. (1982). The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1). 79-89.
  • Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jucker, A. (1986) News interviews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kaltenböck, G. (2009). Initial I think: Main or Commment clause? Discourse and Interaction 2(1), 49-70.
  • Kaltenböck, G. (2010). Comment clauses as constructions. Vienna English Working Papers 19(1,2). 21-46
  • Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam:...
  • Kirk, J.M. (2015). The progressive in Irish English: Looking both ways? In P. Collins (Ed.), Grammatical Change in English World-Wide (pp.87-118)....
  • König, E. (1980). On the context-dependence of the Progressive in English. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense, and Quantifiers. Proceedings of...
  • König, E. (1995). He is being obscure: non-verbal predication and the progressive. In Bertinetto, P.M., Bianchi, V., Dahl, O. & Squartini,...
  • Kranich, S. (2010). The progressive in Modern English: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. London: Longman.
  • Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Levin, M. (2013). The progressive verb in modern American English. In B. Aarts, J. Close & Wallis, S. (eds.), The verb phrase in English:...
  • Ljung, M. (1980). Reflections on the English progressive. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Scheffer, J. (1975). The progressive in English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M. (1998). Modal (un)certainty in political discourse: a functional account. Language Sciences, 19(2), 341-56.
  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M. (2000). The functions of I think in political discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 41-63.
  • Smith, N. (2005). A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation....
  • Smith, N. & Leech, G. (2013). Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In B. Aarts, J.Close & S. Wallis (Eds.), The verb...
  • Smitterberg, E. (2005). The progressive in 19th century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Thompson, S. A.; Mulac, A. (1991). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E.C. Traugott,...
  • Urmson, J.O. (1952). Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61. 480-496.
  • Van Bogaert, J. (2010). A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking...
  • Van Bogaert, J. (2011). I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics,...
  • Van Bogaert, J. (2006).“I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Journal of English...
  • Williams, C. (2001). The progressive form and the non-progressive form in English: The theory of susceptibility to change. Cauce, Revista...
  • Wright, S. (1995). The mystery of the modal progressive. In D.
  • Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in Early Modern English (pp. 467-485). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.