Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction

• Ritva Laury ^[1] ; Tsuyoshi Ono ^[2] ; Ryoko Suzuki ^[3]
  1. [1] University of Helsinki

     University of Helsinki

     Helsinki, Finlandia

     
  2. [2] University of Alberta

     University of Alberta

     Canadá

     
  3. [3] Keio University

     Keio University

     Japón

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Studies in language: International Journal Sponsored by The Foundation "Foundations of Language", ISSN 0378-4177, Vol. 43, Nº 2, 2019, págs. 364-401
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1075/sl.17032.lau
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This paper focuses on ‘clause’, a celebrated structural unit in linguistics, by comparing Finnish and Japanese, two languages which are genetically, typologically, and areally distinct from each other and from English, the language on the basis of which this structural unit has been most typically discussed. We first examine how structural units including the clause have been discussed in the literature on Finnish and Japanese. We will then examine the reality of the clause in everyday talk in these languages quantitatively and qualitatively; in our qualitative analysis, we focus in particular on what units are oriented to by conversational participants. The current study suggests that the degree of grammaticization of the clause varies cross-linguistically and questions the central theoretical status accorded to this structural unit.