Eduardo Pascual Mezquita
A partir de los textos del último Unamuno, se analiza aquí su crítica a la creciente bipolarización y el extremismo político durante la II República Española, tratando de aclarar la distinción unamuniana entre guerra?civil y guerra?incivil; así como las causas de la degeneración mental y religiosa que, según él, delataban la conducta y el resentimiento de muchos jóvenes y los bandos extremos: los hunos y los hotros. De forma constante, Unamuno propuso el ideal alterutral como un modelo –tan utópico como difícil–, imprescindible si quiere lograrse una política auténticamente dialéctica y civil.
From the texts of the last Unamuno, this work analyses his criticism of the increasing bipolarization and political extremism during the Second Spanish Republic; trying to clarify Unamuno’s distinction between civil war and un?civil war; as well as the causes of the mental and religious degeneration that, by his saying, were given away by the behavior of many youth groups and extreme political camps: the «Hunos» and the «Hotros». Constantly Unamuno proposed the «alterutral» ideal as a model –as utopian as it is difficult–, essential if it was about to achieve truly dialectical and civil politics.