Análisis del discurso y securitización de la migración: Trump y la prohibición de entrada de musulmanes a EEUU

• FESSI, INES ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Carthage

     University of Carthage

     Túnez

     
• Localización: SABIR: International Bulletin Of Applied Linguistics, ISSN-e 2695-5695, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Investigaciones en lingüística aplicada), págs. 3-37
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.25115/ibal.v2i1.7216
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Discourse análisis and securization of migration: Trump and the Muslim ban
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    El presente trabajo examina desde la Teoría de la securitización el discurso del expresidente estadounidense Donald Trump, en relación a la amenaza que para él representan los musulmanes y la inmigración de origen medio oriental. Para tal propósito, se procede al análisis de un conjunto de 10 fragmentos de discurso público y entrevistas pronunciados por el expresidente de EEUU, aplicando el enfoque metodológico de Análisis crítico del Discurso de Fairclough (2001). El objetivo principal es identificar las estrategias discursivas especificadas por Van Dijk (2000, 2006, 2011y 2013) en el discurso de securitización que Trump usa a fin de legitimar su decisión de prohibir la entrada de los musulmanes a EE.UU o “muslim ban”. Asimismo Se trata de averiguar si tales estrategias son ideológicamente marcadas y si el movimiento securitizador en cuestión ha sido exitoso.

    Palabras clave: Análisis crítico del discurso, Teoría de la securitización, discurso migratorio, Donald Trump, prohibición de entrada de musulmanes a EEUU  

  • English

    This study examines within the Securitization Theory framework the rhetoric of former-US President Donald Trump, regarding the threat that Muslims and Middle Eastern immigration represent for him. For this purpose, we analyzed 10 excerpts of public speeches and interviews delivered by the former president of the United States, applying the Fairclough’s (2001) methodological approach of Critical Discourse Analysis. The main objective is to identify the discursive strategies specified by Van Dijk (2000, 2006, 2011, 2013) in the securitization speech that Trump uses in order to legitimize his decision to ban the entry of Muslims to the United States (Muslim ban). Moreover, we try to find out if such strategies are ideologically marked and if the securitization movement in question has been successful.

      Keywords: Critical discourse Analysis, Securitization Theory, Migration discourse, Donald Trump, Muslim ban

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ADAMSON, F. B. 2006. “Crossing borders: International migration and national security”. International Security, 31(1): 165–199.
  • AGGER, B. 1992b. The Discourse of Domination: From the Frankfurt School to Postmodernism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • AKBAR, N. y N. F. ABBAS. 2019. “Negative Other-Representation in American Political Speeches”. International Journal of English Linguistics,...
  • AUSTIN, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford university press.
  • BALZACQ, T. 2011. “A theory of securitization: Origins, core assumptions, and variants”. En Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge...
  • BUZAN, B., O. WÆVER y J. DE WILDE. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.
  • CRITELLI, F. M. 2008. “The impact of September 11th on immigrants in the United States”. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 6(2):...
  • DRAKE, A. J., ED. 2009. New Essays on the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
  • EROUKHMANOFF, C. 2018. “‘it’s not a Muslim ban!’ Indirect speech acts and the securitisation of Islam in the United States post-9/11”, Global...
  • EROUKHMANOFF, C. 2017. “Securitisation Theory”. S.; McGlinchey, SM, Rosie Walters, RW y Ch. Scheinpflug, International Relations Theory. Bristol:...
  • FAIRCLOUGH, N. 2001. Language and Power,(2ª edición). Londres: Longman.
  • FAIRCLOUGH, N.1992a. Critical Language Awareness. Londres: Longman.
  • FAIRCLOUGH, N.1992b. Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge, Polity.
  • FOWLER, R., B. HODGE, G. KRESS y T. TREW. 1997. Language and Control. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • GEE, J. P. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). Nueva York: Routledge.
  • HYMES, D. H. 1972. Reinventing Anthropology. Nueva York: Pantheon.
  • IBÁÑEZ, T. y L. IÑÍGUEZ, eds. 1997. Critical Social Psychology. Londres: Sage.
  • KHOSRAVINIK, M. 2010. “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis”....
  • LILLE, K. G. 2018. “Securitization of Immigration under the Trump Administration: Reconceptualizing the Functional Actor through the Judiciary...
  • LINDQVIST, PIA. 2017. “Welcome to the new jungle- A discourse analysis of the securitization of migration in the Calais crisis in British...
  • MENA GARCÍA, T. 2018. “Donald J. Trump: A critical discourse analysis”. Estudios Institucionales, V, 8: 47-73.
  • MOHAMMADI, M. y J.JAVADI. 2017. “A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s language use in US presidential campaign, 2016”. International...
  • RICHARDSON, J.E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave, Macmillan.
  • SINGH, R., ED. 1996. Towards a Critical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • THE WHITE HOUSE. 2017.Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.
  • THOMAS, J. 2016. Doing Critical Ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2016. “Análisis Crítico del Discurso”. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales 30: 203-222.
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2015. “Critical discourse analysis”. En The handbook of discourse analysis, 466-485. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/ochs/articles/Ochs_2015_Discursive_Underpinnings.pdf
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2011. “Discourse and ideology”. En Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2ª ed). Londres: Sage, 379-407.
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2013. “Ideology and Discourse”. En The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, editado por M. Freeden, L. Tower Sargent y...
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2006. “Politics, ideology, and discourse”. En R. Wodak. Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Politics and Language,...
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2003. Ideología y Discurso, Barcelona: Ariel.
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2000. Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Barcelona: Universidad Pompeu Fabra.
  • VERDES-MONTENEGRO ESCÁNEZ, F. J. 2015. “Securitización: agendas de investigación abiertas para el estudio de la seguridad”, Relaciones Internacionales,...
  • VESTEINSSON, K. 2017. "What If They're All Terrorists? The Securitization of Muslims in Post-9/11 Immigration Policy". Pomona...
  • WÆVER, O. 2015. “The Theory Act: Responsibility and Exactitude as Seen from Securitization”, International Relations 29(1): 121–127.
  • WÆVER, O. 2000. “The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Postsovereign Security Orders”. En Kelstrup...
  • WODAK, R. 2001. “What CDA Is about—A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments”. En W. R., y M. Meyer. Methods of Critical...
  • WODAK, R1996. Disorders of Discourse. Londres y Nueva York: Longman.
  • WOODS, J. y C. ARTHUR. D. 2017. Debating immigration in the age of terrorism, polarization, and trump. Lanham: Lexington Books.