In front of the hypothesis of the subsidiarity, commonly accorded to the mechanisms of identification of reference under the label of substitutes (across transformations or without them), this research -to be continued- claims the primary role of those mechanisms with reference to the dialogical and/or spatial-temporal frame, as well concerning the explicit lexical units as the only contextually memorizable or [0] lexical units. In fact, I believe the mechanisms of identification of reference are the sure runaway in the textlinguistic activity; the ineffability of the polysemantic system-meaning is dialogically semiotized in the concrete sense-frame of the course of the textual dynamics.