Prosodic distances between different survey sites in Romance-speaking Europe

• Wendy Elvira García ^[1] ; Anca Diana Bibir ^[2] ; Ramon Cerdà Massó ^[1] ; Paolo Roseano ^[3] ; Adrian Turculet ^[4] ; Annie Baker Campbel ^[1] ; Ana M. Fernández Planas ^[1]
  1. [1] Universitat de Barcelona

     Universitat de Barcelona

     Barcelona, España

     
  2. [2] Universidad de iRumania (España)
  3. [3] Universidd of South Africa
  4. [4] Universidada Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Rumania)

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, ISSN 0718-5758, ISSN-e 0717-1285, Nº. 11, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Número especial XI: Aproximaciones actuales a la entonación en rumano y español), págs. 5-32
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.7764/onomazein.ne11.05
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The aim of this paper is to classify Romanian dialects from a prosodic point of view within the European Romance-speaking area. The data is part of the Multimedia Atlas of Romance Prosody - AMPER (Contini, 1992) and is analysed dialectometrically by means of ProDis (Elvi-ra-García et al., 2015; Fernández Planas, 2016). The database includes more than 17,000 utter-ances produced by 48 speakers from 26 survey sites of 15 varieties of 6 Romance languages (Catalan, Spanish, Italian, Sardinian, Friulian and Romanian). The results show that the two main prosodic areas of Romanian (see Roseano, 2016b) remain separate when they are dialec-tometrized with data from other Romance languages. In addition, if one analyses questions and statements separately, it can be seen that questions allow us to distinguish geoprosodic areas more effectively than statements do (as suggested by previous studies such as Fernán-dez Planas et al., 2015).