Open Science: What’s not to like?

• Hyland, Ken ^[1]
  1. [1] University of East Anglia

     University of East Anglia

     Norwich District, Reino Unido

     
• Localización: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE ), ISSN-e 2340-2784, ISSN 1139-7241, Nº. 46, 2023, págs. 23-32
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.17398/2340-2784.46.23
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

             

  • English

               

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Adams, J., & Gurney, K. (2018). Bilateral and Multilateral Co-authorship and Citation Impact: Patterns in UK and...
  • Albornoz, D., Hillyer, B., Posada, A., Okune, A., & Chan, L. (2019). Principles for an inclusive open science: The OCSDNet Manifesto....
  • Aram, J. D. (2004) Concepts of interdisciplinarity: configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57, 379–412
  • Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy,...
  • Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Social Studies ...
  • Dai, C., Chen, Q., Wan, T., Liu, F., Gong, Y., &Wang, Q. (2021). Literary run away: Increasingly more ...
  • Elsevier. (2017). International comparative performance of the UK research base – 2016.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/660855/uk-research-base-international-comparison-2016.pdf
  • Gardner, S. K. (2013). Paradigmatic differences, power, and status: a qualitative investigation off aculty in ...
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzinand Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of...
  • Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. Continuum.
  • Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: issues and challenges in the production of knowledge. Oxford University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (2020). Peer review: Objectivescreening or wishful thinking? Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes. 1(1),...
  • Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M., (2018). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, ...
  • Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary team work: the dynamics of collaboration and integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, M....
  • Krige, J. (1993). Some socio-historical aspects ofmultinational collaborations in high-energy physicsat CERN between 1975 and 1985. In E....
  • Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A.(2021). Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of...
  • Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the Association for Information...
  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group....
  • Luzón, M. J., & Perez-Llantada, C. (2022). Digital genres in academic knowledge production and communication. Multilingual Matters.
  • Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas,G., Chapin, F. S., & Redman, C. L. (2008).Epistemological ...
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences...
  • National Science Board (2018). Science andEngineering Indicators 2018(NSB-2018-1).National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
  • Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P.,Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state...
  • Reller, T. (2016). Elsevier publishing – a look at the numbers, and more. Elsevier Connect. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/elsevier-publishing-a-look-at-the-numbers-and-more
  • Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Campagna, S. (2011). From print to Web 2.0: the changing face of discourse for special purposes. LSP Journal,...
  • van Noorden, R. (2017) The science that’s neverbeen cited. Nature, 552, 162–164.