Las preguntas orales en el Parlamento español

• Autores: Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez
• Localización: Philologia hispalensis, ISSN-e 2253-8321, ISSN 1132-0265, Vol. 26, Nº 1-2, 2012, págs. 129-150
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.12795/ph.2012.v26.i01.07
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bayley, P. (2004). “The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse”. P.Bayley (ed.), 1–44.
  • Bayley, P., (2004, ed.). cross cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
  • Borthwick, R.L., 1993. “On the floor of the house”. Parliamentary questions, M.Franklin-P.Norton (eds.). Oxford, Oxford University Press,...
  • Briz, A.Valesco (2003). “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial”. oralia 6, 7-61.
  • Bull, P. y Mayer, K. (1993). “How not to answer questions in political interviews”. Political Psychology 14 (4), 651–666.
  • Bull, P. (1994). “On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews”. Journal of language and social Psychology 13...
  • Bull, P., (2003). The microanalysis of Political communication: claptrap and Ambiguity. London, Routledge.
  • Burguera, J. (2010). gramática y pragmática de la interrogación retórica en español. una aplicación al debate parlamentario, univ. barcelona.
  • Chilton, P., (2002, ed). Politics as text and talk. Analytic approaches to political discourse. Philadelphia, J.Benjamins.
  • Chilton, P., (2004). Analysing Political discourse. London, Routledge.
  • Chilton, P. y Schäffner, C. (2002) “Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse”, en P.Chilton (ed), 1-44.
  • Dillon, J. (1990). The Practice of questioning. London, Routledge.
  • Emmertsen, S. (2007): “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (2007) 570–591
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2000). lingüística Pragmática y Análisis del discurso. Madrid, Arco Libros.
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C., (2006). “Operadores de intensificación del adjetivo: los cuantificadores escalares”. Anuario de estudios Filológicos,...
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C., (2009a). “Parliamentary (im)politeness and argumentative force: “decirles, señorías, que…(to say, sirs, to you, that…)”,.Actas...
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C., (2009b). “El debate entre Zapatero y_Rajoy: estudio textual e interactivo”. tonos digital 18, www.tonosdigital.com
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C., (2009c). diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid, Arco Libros.
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C.,(en prensa a). “El debate Zapatero/Rajoy: estudio argumentativo”, estudios críticos sobre la comunicación, 1.
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C., (en prensa b). “La aserción parlamentaria: de la modalidad al metadiscurso”, oralia, 2010, e.p.
  • Fuentes Rodríguez, C. y E. Alcaide (2002). mecanismos lingüísticos de la persuasión. Madrid, Arco Libros.
  • Harris, S. (1991). “Evasive action: how politicians respond to questions in political interviews”. broadcast talk, P.Scannell (ed.), London,...
  • Harris, S., (2001). “Being politically impolite: extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse”. discourse and society 12...
  • Heritage, J. (2002). “The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content”. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11),...
  • Heritage, J., (2003). “Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview”. studies in language and social Interaction, P.Glenn...
  • Ilie, C. (1994). What else can I tell you? A Pragmatic study of english Rhetorical questions as discursive and Argumentative Acts, Stockholm,...
  • Ilie, C., (2003). “Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as rhetorical strategies”. dialogue Analysis 2000: selected Papers...
  • Ilie, C., (2004). “Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: a rhetoric approach”. Bayley, P. (Ed.),...
  • Pérez de Ayala, S. (2001). “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? -Politeness in Question Time”. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 143-169
  • Rasiah, P. (2010). “A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse”, Journal of Pragmatics 42. 664–680.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (2004): “Text and context of parliamentary debates”, en Bayley, P. (ed.), 339–372.
  • Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political language. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.