Approche Sémiologique des langues dessignes et principe de la "glose": la question de l'annotation infra-unités gestuelles

• Marie-Anne Sallandre ^[1] ; Brigitte Garcia ^[1]
  1. [1] Université Paris 8-Paris
• Localización: Hesperia: Anuario de filología hispánica, ISSN 1139-3181, Nº 22, 2, 2019, págs. 57-79
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.35869/hafh.v22i0.1655
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Resumen

  • First, we present the types of discourse units most commonly used for the linguistic description ofsign languages (beyond specific terminologies): lexical signs, classifier constructions and role shifts in particular.Then, after having briefly outlined our theoretical approach, theSemiological approach, we report on the typesof units proposed by this approach, namely, in addition to pointing units and fingerspellling units, these twomain types, lexical units andtransfer units. This finally allows us to explain, from detailed examples, the typesof difficulties we encounter in our ELAN annotations, which are linked in particular to the basic principle of agloss-based notation. These examples, representative of our French Sign Language (LSF) corpora, are problematicbecause of the interweaving of unit types, their multilinearity and the complexity of discursive constructions.These difficulties attest to the need for a means of annotating relevant elements at an infra-unit level

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Antinoro Pizzuto, Elena;Chiari, Isabella et Rossini, Paolo (2010), “Representing sign lan-guage: Theoretical, methodological and practical...
  • Cuxac, Christian (1985), “Esquisse d’une typologie des Langues des Signes”,Journée d’études n10,Autour de la Langue des Signes,4 juin 1983,...
  • Cuxac, Christian (2000),La Langue des Signes Française (LSF). Les Voies de l’Iconicité, Paris: Ophrys.
  • Cuxac, Christian (2014), “Langues des signes : une modélisation sémiologique”, La Nouvelle Revuede l’adaptation et de la scolarisation, 64,...
  • Cuxac, Christian et Antinoro Pizzuto, Elena (2010), “Emergence, norme et variation dans leslangues des signes : vers une redéfinition conceptuelle”,Langage...
  • Cuxac, Christian;Braffort, Annelies; Choisier, Annick; Collet, Christophe; Dalle, Patrice; Fusellier-Souza, Ivani; Jirou, Gwenaëlle; Lejeune,...
  • Cuxac, Christian etSallandre, Marie-Anne (2007), “Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly Iconic Structures, degenerated...
  • Culioli, Antoine (1990),Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Paris: Ophrys.
  • De Matteo, Asa (1977), “Visual Imagery and visual Analogues in American Sign Language” inFriedmann, Lynn (Ed.),On the other hand:...
  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark (1996), “Blending as a Central Process of Grammar” inGoldberg, Adele (Ed.),Conceptual Structure, Discourse...
  • Friedman, Lynn (Ed.) (1977),On the Other Hand.New Perspectives on American Sign Language,New York, London: Academic Press.
  • Fusellier Souza, Ivani (2006), “Emergence and development of Signed Languages : from diachro-nic ontogenesis to diachronic phylogenesis”,Sign...
  • Garcia, Brigitte (2010),Sourds, surdité, langue(s) des signes et épistémologie des sciences du langage. Problématiques de la scripturisation...
  • Garcia, Brigitte et L'Huillier, Marie-Thérèse (2011),Corpus Creagest, Dialogues en LSF adulte.https://www.ortolang.fr/market/corpora/ortolang-000926
  • Garcia, Brigitte et Sallandre, Marie-Anne (2014), “Reference resolution in French Sign Language (LSF)” in Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia and Zribi-Hertz,...
  • Jakobson, Roman (1963) [1957],Essais de linguistique générale, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
  • Johnston, Trevor (2008), “Corpus linguistics and signed languages: no lemmata, no corpus”, In O.Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, T. Hanke, E. D. Thoutenhoofd...
  • Klima, Edward et Bellugi, Ursula (eds.) (1979),The Signs of Language, Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
  • Langacker, Ron (1987),Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford Univer-sity Press.
  • Langacker, Ron (1991),Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Liddell, Scott (2003),Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Mandel, Mark (1977), “Iconic devices in American Sign Language” in Friedmann, Lynn (Ed.),Onthe other hand: New Perspectives on American Sign...
  • Padden, Carol (1988),Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language, New York:Garland Publishing.Petitta, Giulia;DiRenzo,...
  • Sallandre, Marie-Anne (2003),Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative decatégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire...
  • Sallandre, Marie-Anne (2014),Compositionnalité des unités sémantiques en langues des signes. Perspective typologique et développementale,...
  • Sallandre, Marie-Anne;DiRenzo, Alessio et Gavrilescu, Robert (2016), “Various types ofpersonal transfers (constructed actions) in seven sign...
  • Sallandre, Marie-Anne et Garcia, Brigitte (2013), “Epistemological issues in the semiologicalmodel for the annotation of sign language” in...
  • Sennikova, Yana et Garcia, Brigitte (2018), “Statut et rôle des composants sublexicaux dans lastructuration du lexique en langue des signes...
  • Supalla, Ted (1978), “Morphology of Verbs of Motion and Location in American Sign Language” in Caccamise, Frank and Hicks, Doin (Eds.),American...
  • Stokoe, William (1960), “Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systemsof the American deaf”,Journal of deaf studies...
  • Sutton, Valerie (1999),Lessons in SignWriting. Textbook Workbook, Reprint, 1995, La Jolla, Cali-fornia: Deaf Action Committee for Sign Writing.
  • Winston, Elisabeth (1991), “Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign Language text”,Sign Language Studies,73, pp. 397-410